Growth-To-Value Rotation Spikes
Clients know I have been calling a Growth-to-Value rotation since last April and again spoke directly to its continuation when invited 1st of year to present my StockChartsTV 2021 Predictions.
- JAN 16, 2021 StockChartsTV: 2021 Predictions
- OCT 9: The Biden Bid Meets Value Rotation
- AUG 11: Rotation into Value is Underway
- JULY 14: Value is ‘Wicked Oversold’
- JUNE 8: Historic Momentum Factor Rotation Into Value
- JUNE 1: Intermarket Chart Attack: Value Takes Flight
- MAY 30: ForexAnalytix Interview: The Case For Value Over Momentum
- MAY 26: Fishing Plan for Week of May 26 -29: Violent Rotation
- APRIL 18, 2020: Intermarket Chart Attack: Rotation Into Value Set-Up
Here was my confirmation that the rotation was about to explode higher when on October 9th, 2020 I wrote:
Reflation Trade Above 10YR 0.666%
The 10yr treasury yield is now 1.6% and with it much higher Oil/Energy, Financials, Commodities, Cyclicals, Small Caps…
I doubled down after the presidential election and Pfizer vaccine announcement November 9th when I wrote this for clients November 17, 2020:
Short Covering Can Cause Trend Reversals
I have been saying and writing for months that Q4 would be when the Growth-to-Value rotation trade takes place in earnest. I just didn’t think it would happen all-at-once last Sunday when Pfizer announced a potential vaccine for Covid. Nonetheless, the rotation is on and has caused large short covering. Short covering does not a trend reversal make, but it can be the start of a trend reversal…
Fast forward to today: We have come a long way in the Growth-to-Value rotation, but are we done? My intermarket analysis says, shockingly: NOT DONE.
Intermarket Analysis Revisited
Tech Wreck Confirms Rotation
Technically, I expected and called for an oil reversal Feb 27th when Crude tagged $60. It did pull back 7% before exploding higher this week above my line-in-sand $65.65. We even closed above on a weekly time-frame so, technically, above is bullish, below is not.
In the meantime, we have also seen a Tech Wreck of late wherein many prior high-fliers are down 30-40% past month, including momentum favorite TSLA and the momentum ETF poster child of 1999-style valuations ARKK.
Most do not realize that cash dividends on stocks have historically represented, in real terms (after inflation), approximately 75 percent of stocks’ long-term total return. So as inflation expectations have risen strongly since August, with yields, we have a rotation into value that is picking up steam as Tech offers no dividend protection at a time when higher inflation drives nominal and real earnings growth lower.
When we take inflation into account, the importance of dividend income is magnified even further. During the past century, the average rate of inflation was 3.3 percent per year reducing the nominal 5 percent earnings growth rate to a real growth rate of just 1.7 percent. Thus, the inflation-adjusted return on stocks was not 9.6 percent, but 6.3 percent. In real terms, then, dividend income has accounted for almost 75 percent of the annual investment return on stocks.
The late John Bogle, founder of Vanguard.
And this is my thesis of why Energy stocks (and oil spiking) dominates over other commodities in the CRB index (and has received the lion’s share of recent out-sized performance). In an nutshell, Oil rises when CPI above 2% and CPI is rising. Remember my recommendations during this Energy run for clients:
- XOM from $32.70 (October 29th) as best integrated, followed by OXY
- E&P plays as ‘flat oil’ trade with emphasis on the XOP ETF along with high conviction movers: SD, CPE, OXY, APA, DVN PXD
- Oil Refineries MPC, CVI, HFC, VLO when crack spreads widen.
Well crack spreads are widening with this oil rip because the implication is that gasoline will go up even faster than oil and this will drive a feedback look of making CPI rise faster. And now remember the ARKK holdings are comprised of high-growth, zero dividend names that have been sold off viciously in the past few weeks, and despite anticipated strong bounces once Nasdaq draw-down slows, I am not expecting out-performance from this group as my theme for this growth-to-value rotation that I have written and spoken about to clients since April 18th is still in play.
Political, Fiscal, Monetary Regime Change
Something else happened this week that is noteworthy from a political point of support for higher energy costs: Biden and Saudi Arabia tensions.
OPEC+ decided to keep a tight limit on oil production next month, sending prices soaring in a market that had been expecting additional supply.
And US Shale producers are not likely to increase production to offset price:
“The severe drop in activity in the U.S. along with the high decline rates of shale and the pressure from the investment community to maintain discipline instead of growth means in my view that shale will not get back to where it was in the U.S.,” Occidental Petroleum CEO Vicki Hollub.
Translation: Gas at the pump is likely to rise…
“Pencil in a $10/barrel rise per month. At that pace, oil prices could reach $100/barrel during the course of the summer. That’s the message the Saudis and Russians want to send to the Biden administration…” Towards $100 Oil?
The following is an excerpt taken from Michael Kao of @UrbanKaoboy – commentating on the recent Saudi Arabian decision:
OPEC+ meeting “was a shock.” Especially notable: SA’s decision to roll over its voluntary cuts. With 6 months of consecutive supply draws, YE’21 global inventories will be below the OPEC+ “safety stock” target of 2.75B bbls. This has led to serious price spikes in the past. BUT, the only reason oil is flirting with $70 now is artificially inelastic supply, as demand recovery still has a way to go before hitting pre-COVID levels of 100.6 mmbpd vs 94.8 mmbpd currently.Jet fuel demand, notably, is still 45% off-line and will be the biggest forward driver of oil demand recovery. Most other distillates have caught up to pre-COVID levels of demand.As I’ve been tweeting, the geopolitical shift under Biden is significant. Lakshmi agrees. Obama/Biden Admin was overtly pro-Iran; Trump Admin flipped to pro-SA. Now, Biden/Harris seems to have flipped back to pro-Iran at least rhetorically.…there seems to be real resolve for OPEC+ to keep supply artificially inelastic, as it saw what happened when it did the opposite last year. OPEC+ senses that the policy shifts in Biden Admin are putting the US in a “checkmate” situation, potentially setting up a vicious cycle for the consumer but a virtuous cycle for oil.
- Step 1: Fiscal stimulus is geared towards pushing $ into the lowest wealth deciles who spend a big chunk of their stimulus checks on commodities like gasoline…
- Step 2: BUT the “ESG/Climate shackles” put on the shale industry AND the steep backwardation of the forward curve make it difficult for US shale to ramp up production…
- Step 3: A simultaneous return to anti-SA foreign policy is emboldening SA/OPEC+ to make US dependency on ME imports painful, which hurts the lowest deciles of wealth…
- Step 4: …which potentially spurs more stimulus. Go back to Step 1. Rinse. Repeat.
Lastly, US “Joe Consumer” is just on the precipice of feeling significantly higher gasoline prices, so expect this to manifest in CPI numbers over the next several months.
Oil As Inflation Hedge
JPM further demonstrates, “Taking into account current valuations and carry, the overall BCOM Index, Agriculture and Energy are among the best cross asset inflation hedges at the moment and offer a better hedge than base and precious metals.”
Stimulus Benefits Oil
Backwardation As Predictor of Oil Price
… historical contango-to-backwardation flips… in 7 out of 11 such scenarios since 1988, spot prices were significantly higher in the following year.Notably, in the 4 scenarios where prices went DOWN, they were all explainable by exogenous demand shocks: 1) end of Gulf War in 1991, 2) Russian crisis in 1998, 3) Iranian waiver rug-pull by Trump in 2018, 4) COVID demand collapse in 2020. Michael Kao
Summary – New Regimes
The entire point of this post is to highlight that, big picture, the Growth-to-Value rotation does not look done – from a macro, intermarket, or technical perspective. From my updating of intermarket analysis charts in client’s slack channel, you can see my thesis that higher yields and a steepening yield curve does not look done. With federal deficit as percentage of GDP at 20% (!), inflation does not look done, nor does the active hedging in the ‘reflation’ trades from the threat of higher inflation. Rising real yields as a result of higher inflation (and/or inflation expectations) will create pressure on Tech plays and support the rotation/bid into Energy/Commodities/Oil as a hedge. And along this vein, “Taper Tantrum” in bonds does not look done and that creates an entire new paradigm of market risk and rotation (as discussed in my Nov 10, 2019 article: Bonds Are Stocks Without A Circuit Breaker)
At some point this momentum-driven bond bubble will be unwound. Granted, it is like a fully-loaded locomotive that needs miles and miles of track to even come to a stop so as not to derail, but wouldn’t it be logical, and somewhat ironic, if it is in fact higher equities that triggers the selling of bonds that causes the next market correction?
It’s going to plan perfectly when bonds roll over, structurally forcing rates to pop, then oil spikes with the Reflation trades (think inflation spike), while Momentum stocks are sold off because they’re overvalued relative to Value…and cause indices to correct. This move could be quicker than folks think as liquidity is ‘challenged’ in bond sell off and Volatility in the bond market spills over into equities.
Samantha LaDuc